Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGLAX vs RWIFX
RGLAX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts RGLAX vs RWIFX
RGLAX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGLAX vs. RWIFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLAX is a Buy and RWIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. RGLAX (21.7B). RWIFX pays higher dividends than RGLAX: RWIFX (1.57) vs RGLAX (0.25). RGLAX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: RGLAX (7 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). RGLAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). RWIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLAX (35.00). RGLAX (250) and RWIFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.36 vs. RWIFX (11.87). RGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. RWIFX (34.54).
| RGLAX | RWIFX | RGLAX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.46 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.46 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.492 | 16.246 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7B | 158B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.57 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.36 | 11.87 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.31 | 53.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 34.54 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement