Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGLHX vs WGIFX
RGLHX vs WGIFX Comparison
Open Charts RGLHX vs WGIFX
RGLHX vs WGIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGLHX vs. WGIFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLHX is a Hold and WGIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WGIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. RGLHX (21.5B). WGIFX pays higher dividends than RGLHX: WGIFX (1.52) vs RGLHX (0.48). RGLHX was incepted earlier than WGIFX: RGLHX (7 years) vs WGIFX (18 years). RGLHX (1.24) is less costly to investors than WGIFX (0.52). WGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGLHX (35.00). RGLHX (250) and WGIFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGLHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.80 vs. WGIFX (22.16). RGLHX return over 5 years is better than : 52.22 vs. WGIFX (36.74).
| RGLHX | WGIFX | RGLHX / WGIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.52 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.52 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.218 | 15.759 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 160B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.52 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.80 | 22.16 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.26 | 54.44 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.22 | 36.74 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers