Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGPCX vs TFAFX
RGPCX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGPCX vs. TFAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGPCX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGPCX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. TFAFX (37.1M). RGPCX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: RGPCX (0.16) vs TFAFX (0.00). RGPCX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: RGPCX (14 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.91) is less costly to investors than RGPCX (1.01). RGPCX (250) and TFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. TFAFX (8.72). RGPCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.53 vs. TFAFX (17.60).
| RGPCX | TFAFX | RGPCX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.64 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.91 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.038 | 8.441 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 37.1M | 65,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 8.72 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.19 | 45.32 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.53 | 17.60 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | N/A | - |