Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGPCX vs TFAFX
RGPCX vs TFAFX Comparison
Open Charts RGPCX vs TFAFX
RGPCX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGPCX vs. TFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGPCX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGPCX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. TFAFX (38.9M). RGPCX pays higher dividends than TFAFX: RGPCX (0.10) vs TFAFX (0.00). RGPCX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: RGPCX (14 years) vs TFAFX (7 years). TFAFX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RGPCX (1.01). TFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.70 vs. RGPCX (1.00). RGPCX (250) and TFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. RGPCX (7.32). RGPCX (18.46) and TFAFX (18.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGPCX | TFAFX | RGPCX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.58 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.76 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.947 | 7.722 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 38.9M | 72,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 11.33 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.91 | 50.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 18.25 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers