Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs RLLGX
RGSAX vs RLLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs RLLGX
RGSAX vs RLLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. RLLGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Hold and RLLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. RGSAX (35.3M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than RLLGX: RGSAX (2.67) vs RLLGX (0.90). RGSAX was incepted earlier than RLLGX: RGSAX (25 years) vs RLLGX (17 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). RLLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: RLLGX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). RLLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.82 vs. RGSAX (-3.56). RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. RGSAX (-33.15).
| RGSAX | RLLGX | RGSAX / RLLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.65 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.65 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.409 | 14.864 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.90 | 297% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.56 | 15.82 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 42.42 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.15 | -0.62 | 5,323% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.37 | 90.37 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement