Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs RSLFX
RGSAX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs RSLFX
RGSAX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. RGSAX (34.9M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSAX (2.83) vs RSLFX (0.84). RGSAX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSAX (24 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.73 vs. RGSAX (-7.25). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.01 vs. RGSAX (-38.49).
| RGSAX | RSLFX | RGSAX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.70 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.70 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.811 | 14.428 | 13% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 0.84 | 336% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.25 | 20.73 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.05 | 41.31 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.49 | -2.01 | 1,918% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.61 | 108.64 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement