Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs RSLFX
RGSAX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs RSLFX
RGSAX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. RGSAX (33.5M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSAX (2.66) vs RSLFX (0.81). RGSAX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSAX (25 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. RGSAX (-7.66). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.47 vs. RGSAX (-38.48).
| RGSAX | RSLFX | RGSAX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.70 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.70 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.931 | 12.524 | 23% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.5M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 0.81 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.66 | 9.55 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 39.09 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.48 | -7.47 | 515% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.86 | 90.43 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement