Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs SCWCX
RGSAX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs SCWCX
RGSAX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. SCWCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Hold and SCWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. RGSAX (33.5M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: RGSAX (2.66) vs SCWCX (0.12). RGSAX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: RGSAX (25 years) vs SCWCX (26 years). SCWCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGSAX (1.66). SCWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: SCWCX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). SCWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. RGSAX (-7.66). SCWCX return over 5 years is better than : -15.08 vs. RGSAX (-38.48).
| RGSAX | SCWCX | RGSAX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 1.77 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.77 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.931 | 11.709 | 25% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.5M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.66 | 0.12 | 2,248% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.66 | 7.14 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 33.12 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.48 | -15.08 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.86 | 61.27 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement