Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSFX vs RGWFX
RGSFX vs RGWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSFX vs RGWFX
RGSFX vs RGWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSFX vs. RGWFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSFX is a Hold and RGWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX (28.2B) and RGWFX (28.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RGWFX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: RGWFX (0.55) vs RGSFX (0.50). RGSFX was incepted earlier than RGWFX: RGSFX (11 years) vs RGWFX (14 years). RGSFX (0.51) is less costly to investors than RGWFX (0.43). RGSFX (1.00) and RGWFX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGSFX (250) and RGWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGWFX (11.51) and RGSFX (11.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RGWFX (23.60) and RGSFX (22.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGSFX | RGWFX | RGSFX / RGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.43 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.43 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.590 | 8.623 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 28.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.55 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.33 | 11.51 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.47 | 50.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.79 | 23.60 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.41 | 114.44 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers