Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGT vs TMAT
RGT vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts RGT vs TMAT
RGT vs TMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGT vs. TMAT commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGT is a StrongBuy and TMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMAT has more net assets: 240M vs. RGT (113M). TMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than RGT: TMAT (18.073) vs RGT (9.916). RGT was incepted earlier than TMAT: RGT (13 years) vs TMAT (5 years). TMAT (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than RGT (1.58). RGT has a higher turnover TMAT (5.00) vs TMAT (5.00).
| RGT | TMAT | RGT / TMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.916 | 18.073 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 113M | 240M | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.82 | 193% |
| Turnover | 14.00 | 5.00 | 280% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 0.02 | 4,866% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RGT | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGT has been loosely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGT jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGT | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| APG - RGT | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| ESAB - RGT | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| GFF - RGT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| APAM - RGT | 34% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
| SII - RGT | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||
TMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMAT has been loosely correlated with CORZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMAT jumps, then CORZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMAT | 100% | -3.53% | ||
| CORZ - TMAT | 46% Loosely correlated | -9.62% | ||
| PRCT - TMAT | 20% Poorly correlated | -10.40% | ||
| ACVA - TMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| IONQ - TMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.44% | ||
| WULF - TMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -10.18% | ||
More | ||||