Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVAX vs RMABX
RGVAX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVAX vs. RMABX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVAX is a Hold and RMABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RMABX (12.2B). RMABX pays higher dividends than RGVAX: RMABX (3.55) vs RGVAX (3.31). RGVAX was incepted earlier than RMABX: RGVAX (23 years) vs RMABX (15 years). RMABX (1.41) and RGVAX (1.37) have similar cost to investors . RMABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). RGVAX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. RGVAX (6.42). RMABX return over 5 years is better than : -6.35 vs. RGVAX (-9.26).
| RGVAX | RMABX | RGVAX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.36 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.41 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.258 | 6.800 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 12.2B | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.42 | 6.96 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.13 | 10.64 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.26 | -6.35 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.39 | 0.99 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers