Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVAX vs RMABX
RGVAX vs RMABX Comparison
Open Charts RGVAX vs RMABX
RGVAX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVAX vs. RMABX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVAX is a Hold and RMABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. RMABX (12.9B). RMABX (3.40) and RGVAX (3.31) have matching dividends . RGVAX was incepted earlier than RMABX: RGVAX (24 years) vs RMABX (16 years). RMABX (1.35) and RGVAX (1.33) have similar cost to investors . RMABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). RGVAX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. RGVAX (-1.42). RMABX return over 5 years is better than : -3.74 vs. RGVAX (-6.25).
| RGVAX | RMABX | RGVAX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.153 | -1.977 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 12.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | -0.84 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.72 | 10.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.25 | -3.74 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.45 | -0.84 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement