Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVAX vs RMABX
RGVAX vs RMABX Comparison
Open Charts RGVAX vs RMABX
RGVAX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVAX vs. RMABX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVAX is a Hold and RMABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. RMABX (13.1B). RMABX pays higher dividends than RGVAX: RMABX (3.48) vs RGVAX (3.30). RGVAX was incepted earlier than RMABX: RGVAX (24 years) vs RMABX (16 years). RMABX (1.35) and RGVAX (1.33) have similar cost to investors . RMABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). RGVAX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. RGVAX (3.23). RMABX return over 5 years is better than : -2.02 vs. RGVAX (-3.89).
| RGVAX | RMABX | RGVAX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.35 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.651 | -0.444 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 13.1B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 3.48 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | 4.11 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.59 | 8.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.89 | -2.02 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.42 | 0.90 | -158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers