Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVAX vs RMAFX
RGVAX vs RMAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVAX vs. RMAFX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVAX is a Hold and RMAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVAX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. RMAFX (12.2B). RMAFX pays higher dividends than RGVAX: RMAFX (4.55) vs RGVAX (3.31). RGVAX was incepted earlier than RMAFX: RGVAX (23 years) vs RMAFX (15 years). RGVAX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RMAFX (0.38). RMAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. RGVAX (50.00). RGVAX (250) and RMAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. RGVAX (6.06). RMAFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.42 vs. RGVAX (-9.41).
| RGVAX | RMAFX | RGVAX / RMAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.33 | 403% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.38 | 361% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.082 | 7.671 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 12.2B | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 4.55 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 7.77 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.95 | 13.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.41 | -1.42 | 662% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.48 | 12.07 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers