Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVBX vs RMACX
RGVBX vs RMACX Comparison
Open Charts RGVBX vs RMACX
RGVBX vs RMACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVBX vs. RMACX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVBX is a Hold and RMACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. RMACX (13B). RMACX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: RMACX (3.90) vs RGVBX (3.36). RGVBX was incepted earlier than RMACX: RGVBX (24 years) vs RMACX (16 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RMACX (0.92). RMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). RGVBX (250) and RMACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.98 vs. RGVBX (0.64). RMACX return over 5 years is better than : -1.03 vs. RGVBX (-5.73).
| RGVBX | RMACX | RGVBX / RMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.92 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.92 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.701 | -1.139 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 13B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.64 | 1.98 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.71 | 12.81 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.73 | -1.03 | 558% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.18 | 4.14 | -53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers