Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVBX vs RMBEX
RGVBX vs RMBEX Comparison
Open Charts RGVBX vs RMBEX
RGVBX vs RMBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVBX vs. RMBEX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVBX is a Hold and RMBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. RMBEX (12.9B). RMBEX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: RMBEX (3.79) vs RGVBX (3.31). RGVBX was incepted earlier than RMBEX: RGVBX (24 years) vs RMBEX (12 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RMBEX (1.09). RMBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVBX (50.00). RGVBX (250) and RMBEX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.42 vs. RGVBX (-1.42). RMBEX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. RGVBX (-6.33).
| RGVBX | RMBEX | RGVBX / RMBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.08 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.09 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.157 | -1.699 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 12.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.79 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | -0.42 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.73 | 11.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.33 | -2.11 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.47 | 2.62 | -94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers