Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVCX vs RMABX
RGVCX vs RMABX Comparison
Open Charts RGVCX vs RMABX
RGVCX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVCX vs. RMABX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVCX is a Hold and RMABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. RMABX (13.1B). RGVCX pays higher dividends than RMABX: RGVCX (3.75) vs RMABX (3.45). RGVCX was incepted earlier than RMABX: RGVCX (24 years) vs RMABX (16 years). RMABX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RGVCX (0.89). RMABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). RGVCX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. RGVCX (2.81). RMABX return over 5 years is better than : -2.64 vs. RGVCX (-2.95).
| RGVCX | RMABX | RGVCX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.35 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.35 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.899 | -0.876 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 13.1B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 3.45 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 3.35 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.92 | 8.83 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.95 | -2.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.41 | 0.22 | 1,114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement