Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVCX vs RMABX
RGVCX vs RMABX Comparison
Open Charts RGVCX vs RMABX
RGVCX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVCX vs. RMABX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVCX is a Hold and RMABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. RMABX (12.9B). RGVCX pays higher dividends than RMABX: RGVCX (3.75) vs RMABX (3.40). RGVCX was incepted earlier than RMABX: RGVCX (24 years) vs RMABX (16 years). RMABX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RGVCX (0.89). RMABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). RGVCX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.84 vs. RGVCX (-0.97). RMABX return over 5 years is better than : -3.74 vs. RGVCX (-4.25).
| RGVCX | RMABX | RGVCX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.35 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.35 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.847 | -1.977 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 12.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 3.40 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.97 | -0.84 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.16 | 10.12 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.25 | -3.74 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.86 | -0.84 | -220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement