Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVCX vs RMAHX
RGVCX vs RMAHX Comparison
Open Charts RGVCX vs RMAHX
RGVCX vs RMAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVCX vs. RMAHX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVCX is a Hold and RMAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. RMAHX (13B). RMAHX pays higher dividends than RGVCX: RMAHX (4.43) vs RGVCX (3.81). RGVCX was incepted earlier than RMAHX: RGVCX (24 years) vs RMAHX (11 years). RGVCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RMAHX (0.46). RMAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVCX (50.00). RGVCX (250) and RMAHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.51 vs. RGVCX (1.09). RMAHX return over 5 years is better than : 1.48 vs. RGVCX (-3.71).
| RGVCX | RMAHX | RGVCX / RMAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.42 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.46 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.428 | -0.839 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 13B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 4.43 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.09 | 2.51 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.05 | 14.52 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.71 | 1.48 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.17 | 10.00 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement