Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGVGX vs RMACX
RGVGX vs RMACX Comparison
Open Charts RGVGX vs RMACX
RGVGX vs RMACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGVGX vs. RMACX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGVGX is a Hold and RMACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. RMACX (13B). RGVGX pays higher dividends than RMACX: RGVGX (4.48) vs RMACX (3.90). RGVGX was incepted earlier than RMACX: RGVGX (17 years) vs RMACX (16 years). RMACX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGVGX (0.25). RMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGVGX (50.00). RGVGX (250) and RMACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.98 vs. RGVGX (1.84). RGVGX return over 5 years is better than : -0.48 vs. RMACX (-1.03).
| RGVGX | RMACX | RGVGX / RMACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.92 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.92 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.050 | -1.139 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 13B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.48 | 3.90 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.84 | 1.98 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.33 | 12.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.48 | -1.03 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.15 | 4.14 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers