Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWAX vs TFAFX
RGWAX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWAX vs. TFAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWAX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWAX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. TFAFX (37.1M). RGWAX (0.00) and TFAFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGWAX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: RGWAX (14 years) vs TFAFX (6 years). TFAFX (2.91) is less costly to investors than RGWAX (1.47). RGWAX (250) and TFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGWAX (9.12) and TFAFX (8.72) have marching annual gain over last year. RGWAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.31 vs. TFAFX (17.60).
| RGWAX | TFAFX | RGWAX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.64 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.91 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.572 | 8.441 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 37.1M | 65,229% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 8.72 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.73 | 45.32 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.31 | 17.60 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.83 | N/A | - |