Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWAX vs TFAFX
RGWAX vs TFAFX Comparison
Open Charts RGWAX vs TFAFX
RGWAX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWAX vs. TFAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWAX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWAX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. TFAFX (38.9M). RGWAX (0.00) and TFAFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGWAX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: RGWAX (14 years) vs TFAFX (7 years). TFAFX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RGWAX (1.47). TFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.70 vs. RGWAX (1.00). RGWAX (250) and TFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. RGWAX (6.65). TFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.25 vs. RGWAX (15.18).
| RGWAX | TFAFX | RGWAX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.58 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 2.76 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.613 | 7.722 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 38.9M | 72,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 11.33 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.38 | 50.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.18 | 18.25 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement