Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWBX vs TFAFX
RGWBX vs TFAFX Comparison
Open Charts RGWBX vs TFAFX
RGWBX vs TFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWBX vs. TFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWBX is a Hold and TFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. TFAFX (43M). RGWBX (0.00) and TFAFX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGWBX was incepted earlier than TFAFX: RGWBX (14 years) vs TFAFX (7 years). TFAFX (2.76) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). TFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.70 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX (250) and TFAFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. RGWBX (11.50). RGWBX (18.48) and TFAFX (17.99) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGWBX | TFAFX | RGWBX / TFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.58 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.76 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.672 | 5.946 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 43M | 65,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 14.91 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.94 | 45.77 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.48 | 17.99 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement