Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWBX vs TSAHX
RGWBX vs TSAHX Comparison
Open Charts RGWBX vs TSAHX
RGWBX vs TSAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWBX vs. TSAHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWBX is a Hold and TSAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. TSAHX (298M). TSAHX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: TSAHX (1.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). RGWBX was incepted earlier than TSAHX: RGWBX (14 years) vs TSAHX (11 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than TSAHX (0.84). TSAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSAHX: RGWBX (250) vs TSAHX (100000). TSAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. RGWBX (12.81). TSAHX return over 5 years is better than : 25.07 vs. RGWBX (19.85).
| RGWBX | TSAHX | RGWBX / TSAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.84 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.885 | 11.948 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 298M | 9,195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.81 | 13.62 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.58 | 57.56 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.85 | 25.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.91 | 102.81 | 97% |