Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGWBX vs TSAHX
RGWBX vs TSAHX Comparison
Open Charts RGWBX vs TSAHX
RGWBX vs TSAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGWBX vs. TSAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGWBX is a Hold and TSAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. TSAHX (290M). TSAHX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: TSAHX (1.17) vs RGWBX (0.00). RGWBX was incepted earlier than TSAHX: RGWBX (14 years) vs TSAHX (11 years). RGWBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than TSAHX (0.84). TSAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSAHX: RGWBX (250) vs TSAHX (100000). TSAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. RGWBX (6.60). TSAHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.48 vs. RGWBX (15.06).
| RGWBX | TSAHX | RGWBX / TSAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.76 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.84 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.579 | 9.784 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.1B | 290M | 9,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | 7.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 52.21 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.06 | 20.48 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.45 | 103.81 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers