Advertisement
RHLD vs TIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RHLD is a Hold and TIC is a Hold.
| RHLD | TIC | RHLD / TIC | |
| Capitalization | 1.02B | 2.09B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 227M | 201M | 113% |
| Gain YTD | -36.957 | -5.440 | 679% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.03 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.12B | 2.06B | 55% |
| Total Cash | 117M | 362M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 2.24B | 1.7B | 132% |
| RHLD | TIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RHLD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TIC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RHLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RHLD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RHLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RHLD (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -4.72% price change this week, while TIC (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +2.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
TIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.80% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KGLD | 27.32 | 0.24 | +0.89% |
| Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | |||
| AVDS | 79.53 | 0.57 | +0.72% |
| Avantis International Small Cp Eq ETF | |||
| LMUB | 48.02 | 0.28 | +0.59% |
| iShares Long-Term National Muni Bd ETF | |||
| ARB | 29.79 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | |||
| CBTO | 19.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-Oct | |||
RHLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RHLD and TIC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RHLD and TIC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHLD | 100% | +1.43% | ||
| TIC - RHLD | 25% Poorly correlated | +3.13% | ||
| AZZ - RHLD | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| QUAD - RHLD | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| ABM - RHLD | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LZ - RHLD | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||
TIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIC has been loosely correlated with PC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TIC jumps, then PC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIC | 100% | +3.13% | ||
| PC - TIC | 56% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SPIR - TIC | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| BKSY - TIC | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AZZ - TIC | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| BV - TIC | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||