Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIBEX vs RWMFX
RIBEX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RIBEX vs RWMFX
RIBEX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RIBEX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RIBEX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RIBEX (179B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RIBEX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RIBEX (0.40). RIBEX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RIBEX (12 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RIBEX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RIBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RIBEX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RIBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RIBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.69 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| RIBEX | RWMFX | RIBEX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.31 | 342% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.31 | 342% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.660 | 5.575 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179B | 214B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.40 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 8.10 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.47 | 33.11 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.69 | 26.71 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.82 | 85.42 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement