Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RICCX vs RWMFX
RICCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RICCX vs RWMFX
RICCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RICCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RICCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RICCX (179B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RICCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RICCX (0.53). RICCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RICCX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RICCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RICCX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RICCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| RICCX | RWMFX | RICCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.734 | 5.575 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179B | 214B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 8.10 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.13 | 33.11 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 26.71 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.20 | 85.42 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement