Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RICCX vs RWMFX
RICCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RICCX vs RWMFX
RICCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 201.76B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 185.64B to 217.88B. RWMFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 217.88B. The lowest valued company is RICCX at 185.64B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 9%. RWMFX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while RICCX experienced the biggest fall at -0%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
RICCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RICCX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICCX (186B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RICCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs RICCX (0.52). RICCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RICCX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RICCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RICCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RICCX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICCX (6.88) and RWMFX (6.70) have marching annual gain over last year. RICCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. RWMFX (27.50).
| RICCX | RWMFX | RICCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.934 | 6.456 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.41 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 6.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.56 | 31.77 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.57 | 27.50 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.11 | 81.34 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers