Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RICGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RICGX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICGX (186B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RICGX: RWMFX (1.41) vs RICGX (1.08). RICGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RICGX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than RICGX (0.27). RICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RICGX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. RWMFX (5.49). RICGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. RWMFX (26.78).
| RICGX | RWMFX | RICGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.320 | 5.853 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.41 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 5.49 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.16 | 31.74 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.17 | 26.78 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.13 | 79.92 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers