Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RICGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RICGX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. RICGX (186B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RICGX: RWMFX (1.40) vs RICGX (1.07). RICGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RICGX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than RICGX (0.27). RICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RICGX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RICGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. RWMFX (7.95). RICGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.47 vs. RWMFX (29.48).
| RICGX | RWMFX | RICGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.107 | 1.601 | 506% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 7.95 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.33 | 28.31 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.47 | 29.48 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.64 | 80.56 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers