Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts RICGX vs RWMFX
RICGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RICGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RICGX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RICGX (184B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than RICGX: RWMFX (1.44) vs RICGX (1.09). RICGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: RICGX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than RICGX (0.27). RICGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RICGX (250) and RWMFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. RICGX (4.28). RICGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.32 vs. RWMFX (28.21).
| RICGX | RWMFX | RICGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.239 | 4.384 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184B | 219B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 5.40 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.53 | 27.44 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.32 | 28.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.44 | 77.98 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers