Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGCX vs VFWPX
RIGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RIGCX vs VFWPX
Victory RS International C
Price$12.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.07M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RIGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RIGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RIGCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RIGCX (517M). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RIGCX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RIGCX (1.72). RIGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RIGCX (25 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RIGCX (2.53) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RIGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RIGCX (2500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. RIGCX (16.50). RIGCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.35 vs. VFWPX (42.45).
| RIGCX | VFWPX | RIGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.03 | 6,267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.53 | 0.03 | 8,433% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.836 | 19.900 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 517M | 68B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 2.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.50 | 17.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.08 | 40.91 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.35 | 42.45 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.54 | 53.89 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement