Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RKCIX vs RSLFX
RKCIX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RKCIX vs RSLFX
RKCIX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. RKCIX (69.6M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than RKCIX: RSLFX (0.79) vs RKCIX (0.03). RKCIX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RKCIX (5 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RKCIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RKCIX (25.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RKCIX: RSLFX (250) vs RKCIX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.40 vs. RKCIX (1.21).
| RKCIX | RSLFX | RKCIX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.70 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.324 | 12.200 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.6M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.79 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.21 | 14.40 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 31.56 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.14 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers