RKNEF vs SQNNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RKNEF is a Hold and SQNNY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RKNEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQNNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RKNEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SQNNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RKNEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQNNY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RKNEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SQNNY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
RKNEF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -52.22% price change this week, while SQNNY (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| RKNEF | SQNNY | RKNEF / SQNNY | |
| Capitalization | 26.5M | 5.6B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 10.6M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -10.417 | 3.294 | -316% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.72 | 15.65 | 561% |
| Revenue | 58.3M | 347B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 12.9M | 176B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 87.9M | 7.96B | 1% |
RKNEF | SQNNY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SQNNY's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKNEF (88). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKNEF’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RKNEF (100). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew similarly to RKNEF’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RKNEF (100). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew significantly faster than RKNEF’s over the last 12 months.
SQNNY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RKNEF (65). This means that SQNNY’s stock grew similarly to RKNEF’s over the last 12 months.
RKNEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SQNNY (5). This means that RKNEF’s stock grew similarly to SQNNY’s over the last 12 months.
| RKNEF | SQNNY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MCHI | 47.22 | 0.62 | +1.33% |
| iShares MSCI China ETF | |||
| MARW | 31.16 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Mar ETF | |||
| AOK | 38.07 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | |||
| JULW | 35.36 | -0.04 | -0.12% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jul ETF | |||
| CNCR | 12.66 | -0.15 | -1.20% |
| Range Cancer Therapeutics ETF | |||
RKNEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RKNEF has been loosely correlated with JAXAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RKNEF jumps, then JAXAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RKNEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKNEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| JAXAF - RKNEF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CORZ - RKNEF | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| SQNNY - RKNEF | 33% Poorly correlated | -5.73% | ||
| VRTC - RKNEF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APPIF - RKNEF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SQNNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQNNY has been loosely correlated with SQNXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SQNNY jumps, then SQNXF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQNNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQNNY | 100% | -5.73% | ||
| SQNXF - SQNNY | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RKNEF - SQNNY | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASFT - SQNNY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JAMF - SQNNY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CCOEY - SQNNY | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||