Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.83
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.44M
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SBACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. SBACX (998M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.10) vs SBACX (0.59). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. RLBAX (7.84). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. SBACX (32.38).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.947 | 10.576 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265B | 998M | 26,553% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.59 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 9.53 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.39 | 49.43 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 32.38 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 65.62 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement