Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.23
Change-$0.15 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.47M
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and SBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. SBACX (990M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.15) vs SBACX (0.63). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.08 vs. RLBAX (6.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.63 vs. SBACX (28.31).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.656 | 8.462 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255B | 990M | 25,758% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.63 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 10.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.51 | 39.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.63 | 28.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.89 | 68.83 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement