Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$30.72
Change-$0.15 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SBACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. SBACX (1.01B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.15) vs SBACX (0.63). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. RLBAX (7.29). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.63 vs. SBACX (37.14).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.78 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.236 | 10.759 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 1.01B | 26,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.63 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 10.57 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.30 | 52.51 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.63 | 37.14 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.58 | 74.32 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement