Ad is loading...
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.69
Change-$0.10 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.94B
Touchstone Balanced C
Price$27.49
Change-$0.15 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.73M
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SBACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 233B vs. SBACX (926M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.25) vs SBACX (0.59). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SBACX (27 years). SBACX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.33). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. SBACX (70.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). SBACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. RLBAX (3.29). SBACX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. RLBAX (44.33).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.78 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.78 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.817 | -1.180 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233B | 926M | 25,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.59 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.29 | 7.01 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.13 | 17.87 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.33 | 50.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.35 | 46.74 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...