Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and SBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. SBACX (997M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.12) vs SBACX (0.53). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SBACX (28 years). SBACX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. SBACX (3.13). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. SBACX (23.30).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.76 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.76 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.935 | 4.702 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 997M | 28,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.53 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 3.13 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 33.65 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | 23.30 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.00 | 69.36 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers