Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SBACX
RLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SBACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. SBACX (1.01B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: RLBAX (1.13) vs SBACX (0.54). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SBACX (28 years). SBACX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: RLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. SBACX (6.73). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.85 vs. SBACX (24.71).
| RLBAX | SBACX | RLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.76 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.76 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.555 | 5.333 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 1.01B | 28,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.54 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 6.73 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.70 | 36.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | 24.71 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.93 | 67.71 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers