Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SEBLX
RLBAX vs SEBLX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SEBLX
RLBAX vs SEBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SEBLX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SEBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. SEBLX (997M). SEBLX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: SEBLX (1.25) vs RLBAX (1.12). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SEBLX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SEBLX (88 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than SEBLX (0.99). SEBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEBLX: RLBAX (250) vs SEBLX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.65 vs. SEBLX (3.32). SEBLX (29.01) and RLBAX (28.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RLBAX | SEBLX | RLBAX / SEBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.99 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.99 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 88 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.046 | 5.438 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 997M | 28,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.65 | 3.32 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.21 | 40.06 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.55 | 29.01 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.50 | 80.16 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement