Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SIIIX
RLBAX vs SIIIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SIIIX
RLBAX vs SIIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SIIIX (42.5M). SIIIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: SIIIX (6.51) vs RLBAX (1.14). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SIIIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SIIIX (5 years). SIIIX (2.18) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). SIIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIIIX: RLBAX (250) vs SIIIX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. SIIIX (8.75). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.12 vs. SIIIX (19.75).
| RLBAX | SIIIX | RLBAX / SIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.51 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.18 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.275 | 3.696 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 42.5M | 677,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 6.51 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | 8.75 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.40 | 29.86 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.12 | 19.75 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement