Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SIIIX
RLBAX vs SIIIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SIIIX
RLBAX vs SIIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SIIIX (42.9M). SIIIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: SIIIX (6.44) vs RLBAX (1.11). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SIIIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SIIIX (5 years). SIIIX (2.18) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). SIIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIIIX: RLBAX (250) vs SIIIX (2500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. SIIIX (9.83). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. SIIIX (26.08).
| RLBAX | SIIIX | RLBAX / SIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.51 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.18 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.393 | 5.826 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 42.9M | 671,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 6.44 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | 9.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.40 | 31.43 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.58 | 26.08 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers