Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SVBCX
RLBAX vs SVBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SVBCX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
JHancock Balanced C
Price$31.92
Change+$0.14 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.19B
RLBAX vs SVBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SVBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SVBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. SVBCX (6.19B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SVBCX: RLBAX (1.08) vs SVBCX (0.86). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SVBCX: RLBAX (23 years) vs SVBCX (27 years). SVBCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). SVBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVBCX: RLBAX (250) vs SVBCX (1000). SVBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.67 vs. RLBAX (8.15). SVBCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.86 vs. RLBAX (34.46).
| RLBAX | SVBCX | RLBAX / SVBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.73 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.74 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.298 | 12.014 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 6.19B | 4,247% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.86 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 10.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 42.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.46 | 38.86 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.50 | 82.75 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement