Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs SVBCX
RLBAX vs SVBCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs SVBCX
RLBAX vs SVBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. SVBCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and SVBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. SVBCX (6.9B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than SVBCX: RLBAX (1.14) vs SVBCX (0.86). RLBAX was incepted earlier than SVBCX: RLBAX (24 years) vs SVBCX (27 years). SVBCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). SVBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVBCX: RLBAX (250) vs SVBCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. SVBCX (11.59). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. SVBCX (28.65).
| RLBAX | SVBCX | RLBAX / SVBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.72 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.73 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.354 | 9.614 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 6.9B | 4,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.86 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.80 | 11.59 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.23 | 36.61 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | 28.65 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.06 | 89.68 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement