Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs TMAIX
RLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs TMAIX
RLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. TMAIX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TMAIX (4.46B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: TMAIX (1.74) vs RLBAX (1.12). RLBAX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than TMAIX (1.06). RLBAX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBAX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. TMAIX (4.08). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.11 vs. TMAIX (15.84).
| RLBAX | TMAIX | RLBAX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.86 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.06 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.101 | 6.772 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 4.46B | 6,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.74 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | 4.08 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.37 | 30.75 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.11 | 15.84 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.45 | 64.28 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement