Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WBCCX
RLBAX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WBCCX
RLBAX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WBCCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WBCCX (30.3M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: RLBAX (1.12) vs WBCCX (0.23). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: RLBAX (24 years) vs WBCCX (25 years). WBCCX (2.18) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). WBCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: RLBAX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.83 vs. WBCCX (-7.30). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. WBCCX (-18.73).
| RLBAX | WBCCX | RLBAX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.18 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.18 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.935 | 4.313 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 30.3M | 940,594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.23 | 497% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | -7.30 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.21 | 3.64 | 1,049% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.39 | -18.73 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.00 | -12.51 | -600% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement