Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$41.68
Change-$0.23 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WFAIX (1.24B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.08) vs WFAIX (0.96). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.04). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. WFAIX (-2.99). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. WFAIX (7.27).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.90 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.04 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.298 | 8.919 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 1.24B | 21,261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | -2.99 | -273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.05 | 12.16 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.46 | 7.27 | 474% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.50 | 47.64 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement