Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$41.52
Change-$0.18 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WFAIX (1.28B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.15) vs WFAIX (0.98). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (23 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.04). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. WFAIX (-1.90). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.63 vs. WFAIX (12.56).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.90 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.04 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.236 | 8.971 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 1.28B | 20,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.98 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | -1.90 | -383% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.30 | 22.05 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.63 | 12.56 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.58 | 57.12 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement