Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WFAIX (1.18B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.12) vs WFAIX (0.96). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. WFAIX (-2.47). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.25 vs. WFAIX (-5.97).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.90 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.01 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.668 | 6.163 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.18B | 24,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.96 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | -2.47 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.81 | 9.92 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.25 | -5.97 | -439% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.75 | 47.19 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement