Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFAIX (1.22B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.14) vs WFAIX (0.96). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. WFAIX (5.26). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. WFAIX (-2.77).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.90 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.01 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.988 | 6.185 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.80 | 5.26 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.07 | 10.51 | 391% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.83 | -2.77 | -1,151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.24 | 52.04 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers