Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBAX vs WFAIX
RLBAX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBAX vs. WFAIX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBAX is a Hold and WFAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WFAIX (1.21B). RLBAX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBAX (1.13) vs WFAIX (0.97). RLBAX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBAX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBAX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. WFAIX (1.88). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.85 vs. WFAIX (-5.11).
| RLBAX | WFAIX | RLBAX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.90 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.01 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.555 | 7.401 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 1.21B | 23,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.97 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.72 | 1.88 | 623% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.70 | 12.30 | 339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.85 | -5.11 | -584% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.93 | 47.06 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers