Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBBX vs WFAIX
RLBBX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBBX vs WFAIX
RLBBX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBBX vs. WFAIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBBX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFAIX (1.22B). RLBBX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBBX (1.14) vs WFAIX (0.96). RLBBX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBBX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). RLBBX (1.33) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). RLBBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBBX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. WFAIX (5.26). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.92 vs. WFAIX (-2.77).
| RLBBX | WFAIX | RLBBX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.90 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.01 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.865 | 6.185 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.96 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.97 | 5.26 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.58 | 10.51 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.92 | -2.77 | -1,082% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.36 | 52.04 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers