Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBEX vs TMAIX
RLBEX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBEX vs TMAIX
RLBEX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBEX vs. TMAIX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBEX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TMAIX (4.46B). RLBEX (1.77) and TMAIX (1.74) have matching dividends . RLBEX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBEX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). TMAIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBEX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. TMAIX (4.08). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 30.16 vs. TMAIX (15.84).
| RLBEX | TMAIX | RLBEX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.86 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.06 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.675 | 6.772 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 4.46B | 6,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.74 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 4.08 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.52 | 30.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.16 | 15.84 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.13 | 64.28 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement