Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBEX vs WDIAX
RLBEX vs WDIAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBEX vs WDIAX
RLBEX vs WDIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBEX vs. WDIAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBEX is a Hold and WDIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WDIAX (93.2M). WDIAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: WDIAX (1.88) vs RLBEX (1.77). RLBEX was incepted earlier than WDIAX: RLBEX (24 years) vs WDIAX (27 years). WDIAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIAX (16.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIAX: RLBEX (250) vs WDIAX (1000). WDIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.06 vs. RLBEX (16.67). WDIAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.63 vs. RLBEX (36.03).
| RLBEX | WDIAX | RLBEX / WDIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.75 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.36 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.356 | 13.214 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 93.2M | 309,013% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.88 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 25.06 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.27 | 57.58 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 60.63 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.02 | 109.76 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement