Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBEX vs WFALX
RLBEX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBEX vs WFALX
RLBEX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBEX vs. WFALX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBEX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFALX (1.22B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBEX (1.77) vs WFALX (0.49). RLBEX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBEX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBEX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. WFALX (-8.67). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 33.01 vs. WFALX (-27.61).
| RLBEX | WFALX | RLBEX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.82 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.550 | 6.210 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.49 | 359% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -8.67 | -139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | -16.69 | -237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.01 | -27.61 | -120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.90 | 8.71 | 964% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers