Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs SIIIX
RLBFX vs SIIIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs SIIIX
RLBFX vs SIIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SIIIX (42.9M). SIIIX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: SIIIX (6.44) vs RLBFX (2.03). RLBFX was incepted earlier than SIIIX: RLBFX (24 years) vs SIIIX (5 years). SIIIX (2.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). SIIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIIIX: RLBFX (250) vs SIIIX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. SIIIX (9.83). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.49 vs. SIIIX (26.08).
| RLBFX | SIIIX | RLBFX / SIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.51 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.965 | 5.826 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 42.9M | 671,329% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 6.44 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 9.83 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.99 | 31.43 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.49 | 26.08 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement