Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs SIIIX
RLBFX vs SIIIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs SIIIX
RLBFX vs SIIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SIIIX (42.5M). SIIIX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: SIIIX (6.51) vs RLBFX (2.02). RLBFX was incepted earlier than SIIIX: RLBFX (24 years) vs SIIIX (5 years). SIIIX (2.18) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). SIIIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SIIIX: RLBFX (250) vs SIIIX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.25 vs. SIIIX (8.75). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.01 vs. SIIIX (19.75).
| RLBFX | SIIIX | RLBFX / SIIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.51 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.802 | 3.696 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 42.5M | 677,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 6.51 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.25 | 8.75 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.97 | 29.86 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.01 | 19.75 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement