Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs TMAIX
RLBFX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs TMAIX
RLBFX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. TMAIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TMAIX (4.48B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than TMAIX: RLBFX (2.02) vs TMAIX (1.67). RLBFX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: RLBFX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). TMAIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: RLBFX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.27 vs. TMAIX (11.45). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.33 vs. TMAIX (19.83).
| RLBFX | TMAIX | RLBFX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.86 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.973 | 5.957 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 4.48B | 6,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.27 | 11.45 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.48 | 30.31 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.33 | 19.83 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.15 | 68.14 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers