Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. WEBAX (31M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBFX (2.02) vs WEBAX (1.07). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WEBAX (35 years). WEBAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. WEBAX (-0.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.10 vs. WEBAX (-13.72).
| RLBFX | WEBAX | RLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.817 | 4.732 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 31M | 900,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.07 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.07 | -0.64 | -2,831% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.81 | 7.66 | 611% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.10 | -13.72 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.73 | -6.21 | -1,444% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement