Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WEBAX (30.3M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBFX (2.03) vs WEBAX (0.90). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WEBAX (35 years). WEBAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. WEBAX (-6.68). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. WEBAX (-15.93).
| RLBFX | WEBAX | RLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.705 | 4.902 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 30.3M | 940,594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 0.90 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | -6.68 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.70 | 5.87 | 727% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -15.93 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.98 | -6.83 | -1,288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement