Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WEBAX
RLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WEBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WEBAX (30.8M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: RLBFX (2.05) vs WEBAX (0.91). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WEBAX (35 years). WEBAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: RLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. WEBAX (-3.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. WEBAX (-14.92).
| RLBFX | WEBAX | RLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.43 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.287 | 6.074 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 30.8M | 918,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 0.91 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | -3.64 | -355% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.32 | 8.29 | 559% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.73 | -14.92 | -240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.86 | -7.61 | -1,141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement