Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFAIX
RLBFX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFAIX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Admin
Price$42.32
Change+$0.34 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.28B
RLBFX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFAIX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Buy and WFAIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. WFAIX (1.28B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBFX (2.00) vs WFAIX (0.97). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBFX (23 years) vs WFAIX (26 years). WFAIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFAIX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBFX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. WFAIX (-1.95). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.28 vs. WFAIX (9.64).
| RLBFX | WFAIX | RLBFX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.90 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.04 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.683 | 9.703 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 1.28B | 20,846% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.97 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | -1.95 | -498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.23 | 21.62 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.28 | 9.64 | 480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.87 | 50.90 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement