Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFAIX
RLBFX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFAIX
RLBFX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFAIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFAIX (1.22B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: RLBFX (2.02) vs WFAIX (0.96). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). WFAIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: RLBFX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. WFAIX (5.26). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. WFAIX (-2.77).
| RLBFX | WFAIX | RLBFX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.90 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.01 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.536 | 6.185 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.96 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | 5.26 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.61 | 10.51 | 434% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.80 | -2.77 | -1,367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.65 | 52.04 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement