Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WFALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WFALX (1.24B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBFX (1.97) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. WFALX (-11.04). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. WFALX (-8.97).
| RLBFX | WFALX | RLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.82 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.86 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.331 | 8.604 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 1.24B | 21,141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.52 | 381% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | -11.04 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.18 | -0.39 | -10,778% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.53 | -8.97 | -452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.39 | 22.51 | 330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement