Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFALX
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.00
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
Allspring Index Asset Allocation C
Price$22.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. WFALX (1.29B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBFX (2.00) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBFX (23 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WFALX (12.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. WFALX (-8.98). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.24 vs. WFALX (-6.02).
| RLBFX | WFALX | RLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.82 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.86 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.654 | 9.388 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 1.29B | 20,668% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 0.52 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | -8.98 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.37 | 5.84 | 897% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.24 | -6.02 | -735% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.97 | 25.79 | 310% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement