Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFALX
RLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFALX (1.22B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: RLBFX (2.02) vs WFALX (0.52). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: RLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. WFALX (-6.46). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. WFALX (-26.25).
| RLBFX | WFALX | RLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.82 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.83 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.536 | 5.699 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.52 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | -6.46 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.61 | -15.35 | -297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.80 | -26.25 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.65 | 12.25 | 765% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement