Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WFATX
RLBFX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WFATX
RLBFX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WFATX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFATX (1.22B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WFATX: RLBFX (2.02) vs WFATX (1.18). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WFATX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WFATX (10 years). WFATX (0.76) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: RLBFX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.25 vs. WFATX (3.91). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.01 vs. WFATX (-3.03).
| RLBFX | WFATX | RLBFX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.75 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.76 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.802 | 5.555 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.18 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.25 | 3.91 | 390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.97 | 10.16 | 433% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.01 | -3.03 | -1,157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers